I write this post
in the light of case being heard in the Supreme Court of the country between
the pharmaceutical company Novartis and the Indian government regarding the
patenting of new forms of old medicines. The drug in question is Gleevec about
which quite a lot has been written. You can read more about this here.
When I read this – I’m
reminded of a story told my one of my senior mentors in college who happened to
be a retired professor in medical school. He was speaking to a group of
freshers (new admissions in MBBS) in one of the medical colleges in Kerala
sometime in the early 1980s. He asked the new entrants on what their desires in
life were. Along with the usual answers which you get during that time like the
desire to serve, the doctor father wanting his progeny to follow suit, the
desire to do research to help mankind etc., and one kid told him that he wanted
to buy a Mercedes Benz. The professor replied that leave alone a Mercedes Benz,
he would not be able to buy even the tire of a Mercedes if he becomes a doctor.
Unfortunately, times have
changed. My mentor was wrong. Medical profession is one of the most lucrative
professions in India. The flash and the glamour associated with the profession are
quite on the rise. We have heard about stories of one of our professors coming
for work in their cycles. But, not anymore. The flashy cars doctors drive to
work is one of the major driving forces for many a parent to dream about
sending their children to study medicine.
I’m sure that one of the
major contributors to the transformation the of medical profession as a
lucrative business is the pharmaceutical industry (My blog on pharmaceuticals). And the Novartis vs
Indian government is just the tip of an iceberg of the extreme profiteering
that pharmaceutical companies want to continue doing. The way new drugs are
being pushed into the market is just an indication of how much profits they
look towards making.
I remember a drug called
Rofecoxib which was brought about in the Indian market sometime when I was
finishing my house-surgeoncy. It was marketed as the wonder drug for pain
relief especially in osteo-arthritis. I had gone for it’s ‘release’ in
Trivandrum. It was a very glamorous event. Later, I was told that our
professors were taken to a more glamorous event in Chennai for its’
inauguration in South India. Most of the doctors know what happened to
Rofecoxib in the next 5 years.
A lot of unaccounted deaths
due to cardiac failure started to happen and investigations revealed that
Rofecoxib has cardiac side effects. The shock came when it was found out that
that Rofecoxib was in fact found to have fatal cardiac side-effects even during
clinical trials information of which was suppressed. However, over the 5 years
the company had made its’ profit.
Once I happened to go to a
meeting where the main speaker was someone who had made quite a lot of money in
the stock market. I remember him telling the audience very clearly – ‘Always be
on the lookout for oil companies and pharmaceutical companies. Do not miss
investing in them whatever be the cost. Humans need oil for their machines and
medicines for their bodies. The demand will never go’. He was true.
This is where I hear the
very different message from the Holy Bible. Jesus Christ, whom I believe as my
Lord and personal Savior was the best doctor. There have been many instances of
him healing the sick. And if we read the instances where he healed the sick – there
are few things which come to our immediate notice which are major learning
points for us in the business of health care. In the light of my meditations on
Matthew 8 and 9 over the last 2 days, I just thought of jotting few aspects
which could help us to be better doctors to our patients.
The first is ‘Touch’ –
instances of Jesus touching his patients – Matthew 8:3, 13; Matthew 9: 21, 25,
29. And the second aspect is ‘Compassion’ – which is quite a easy word to
understand but quite difficult to practice. Matthew 9: 36. The third aspect is
the speed with which he was doing things. Being God, he could completely heal
people so fast. But, when I look at myself, many a time I find myself scheming
on what to do to the patient. How much I’ll make out of him? How much
investigations I need to write? How much medicines I’ll give to him? If I do
such a thing, will this fellow come back to me?
The very fact that we do
not have much time to talk to our patients is in itself a major problem whereby
our patients do not find immediate relief upon coming to us. This is something
where ayurvedic practitioners and quacks (read more about quacks here) score quite high over us.
I think most of the
problems that we in the medical profession faces today where we stand accused
to be next only to politicians in the making of money can be got away with if we
could rediscover the art of touching patients, being compassionate to our
patients as they come to us and looking at immediate and fast ways and means to
make their lives easier in the given circumstances. And this ultimately it would
do a lot of good in keeping us in favor with both God and man.
Dr JK Just hope you are not referring to homeopaths as quacks! Homeopathy treats holistically and that requires extensive case taking. Often the classical homeopath may require two to three sittings before prescribing any medicine, this is because there are many finer points to consider and that the first presription is very valuable. Thanks.
ReplyDelete